Skip to main content
18 events
when toggle format what by license comment
Apr 13, 2017 at 12:46 history edited CommunityBot
replaced http://fitness.stackexchange.com/ with https://fitness.stackexchange.com/
May 24, 2012 at 20:36 comment added user3085 I haven't heard any news from the stack exchange team. They said they'd let us know of the outcome when the decision was made, so I assume they're still considering it, but I'll email them to see what's up.
May 24, 2012 at 18:13 comment added Moses What is the status of this? It's now been two months since this thread (which was pretty unanimous in consent) ended, but I haven't seen any updates.
Apr 26, 2012 at 14:03 answer added Trevoke timeline score: 1
Apr 5, 2012 at 1:23 answer added Robert Cartaino timeline score: 6
Apr 5, 2012 at 1:01 history edited user3085 CC BY-SA 3.0
update
Apr 4, 2012 at 19:30 vote accept CommunityBot
Mar 30, 2012 at 17:18 answer added Shauna timeline score: -2
Mar 29, 2012 at 17:41 history tweeted twitter.com/#!/StackFitness/status/185421501342810112
Mar 28, 2012 at 15:26 comment added user3085 @TonnyMadsen I don't think this affects the merger decision, since this will not change the scope of the site. The scope is delineated in the FAQ, and this proposed title change is intended to reflect that.
Mar 28, 2012 at 13:43 comment added user241 The way I was reading it was that changing the site's scope (like expanding and merging with Sports) would also have an impact on the name.
Mar 28, 2012 at 13:21 answer added VPeric timeline score: 8
Mar 28, 2012 at 9:54 comment added Tonny Madsen If we go for this... then the merging with Sports.SE will be even closer. Or?
Mar 28, 2012 at 8:16 comment added Ivo Flipse Mod The last question was about changing the site title, but either way you have my vote. I just don't have a lot of faith in a happy ending
Mar 28, 2012 at 5:17 comment added user3085 Also, those topics were related to changing the scope. This question is about making the scope more clear in the title.
Mar 28, 2012 at 4:35 comment added user3085 True, but with no outcome. I am proposing a very specific change, with what I think is a clearer rationale than previously presented.
Mar 28, 2012 at 1:51 comment added user241 It has been brought up in the past here and here.
Mar 28, 2012 at 0:58 history asked user3085 CC BY-SA 3.0