Timeline for Medical questions
Current License: CC BY-SA 2.5
14 events
when toggle format | what | by | license | comment | |
---|---|---|---|---|---|
Jun 17, 2020 at 9:48 | history | edited | CommunityBot |
Commonmark migration
|
|
Apr 13, 2017 at 12:46 | history | edited | CommunityBot |
replaced http://fitness.stackexchange.com/ with https://fitness.stackexchange.com/
|
|
Jul 10, 2011 at 15:31 | comment | added | Argalatyr | In response to @Ivo Flipse' comment on my answer below, I've created a related question, focused on the FAQ rather than close criteria: meta.fitness.stackexchange.com/questions/133 | |
Jul 10, 2011 at 2:09 | answer | added | Argalatyr | timeline score: 4 | |
Mar 18, 2011 at 18:07 | vote | accept | Janis Peisenieks | ||
Mar 15, 2011 at 18:32 | answer | added | Dori | timeline score: 6 | |
Mar 15, 2011 at 18:27 | history | edited | Dori | CC BY-SA 2.5 |
Clean up spelling, grammar, markdown
|
Mar 15, 2011 at 14:19 | comment | added | Janis Peisenieks | Point well made :) | |
Mar 15, 2011 at 14:00 | comment | added | Ivo Flipse | If you have a medical condition it's your own responsibility to take anything you read on the internet with a grain of salt. I might be a kinesiologist, but I'm not a medical doctor | |
Mar 15, 2011 at 12:27 | comment | added | Janis Peisenieks | So, from what you are saying, we should just ignore any question that would be semi medical related, and would require such a disclaimer to show the person, that the answers should be taken with a grain of salt? | |
Mar 15, 2011 at 10:58 | comment | added | Ivo Flipse | The close reason would just be off-topic @Janis, no need for a new close reason. As for the disclaimer, we shouldn't be giving advice that needs one... | |
Mar 14, 2011 at 23:45 | comment | added | bguiz | +1 @Janis Peisenieks : great question | |
Mar 14, 2011 at 23:41 | answer | added | bguiz | timeline score: 7 | |
Mar 14, 2011 at 22:28 | history | asked | Janis Peisenieks | CC BY-SA 2.5 |