I was looking at this question on glucosamine and initially closed it as being off topic, as I did not notice the word exercise included in parentheses.
I reopened it pending the outcome of this meta discussion, as I don't feel that just saying "I exercise" is enough to bring a nutrition question on topic. The determinant for nutrition since the scope change has always been nutrition as it relates to exercise.
Is saying "I exercise" followed by a nutrition question enough?
I would say it's not sufficient just to invoke the word "exercise" in hopes that it dodges a close vote.
In order for the exercise aspect to play even a small role in the question or any answer, we need to be able to factor in what kind of exercise and regimen we're talking about.
Without "I exercise" I would close it as off-topic.
With "I exercise" I would close it as too broad, because there are just too many unknowns now, and there is no one-size-fits-all answer. It would actually be easier to answer if he said he didn't exercise, but of course, back to point 1 then.
The question would be redeemable, and even a good addition to the library of questions, if it had the relevant details.
