Search Results
| Search type | Search syntax |
|---|---|
| Tags | [tag] |
| Exact | "words here" |
| Author |
user:1234 user:me (yours) |
| Score |
score:3 (3+) score:0 (none) |
| Answers |
answers:3 (3+) answers:0 (none) isaccepted:yes hasaccepted:no inquestion:1234 |
| Views | views:250 |
| Code | code:"if (foo != bar)" |
| Sections |
title:apples body:"apples oranges" |
| URL | url:"*.example.com" |
| Saves | in:saves |
| Status |
closed:yes duplicate:no migrated:no wiki:no |
| Types |
is:question is:answer |
| Exclude |
-[tag] -apples |
| For more details on advanced search visit our help page | |
Results tagged with scope
Search options answers only
not deleted
user 5
3
votes
Accepted
Is our sites title justified?
The scope and name of this site was defined and redefined and debated endlessly until no one wanted to talk about it anymore. … It's the faq and the questions asked that actually defines the scope, and we're always trying to make it easier for the community to help self-moderate and guide users to where they need to be. …
- 355
9
votes
Are questions regarding the assessment of nutritional products considered on-topic?
The topic of these questions are largely in scope, but these types of questions themselves are generally very poor. There's nothing new here. …
- 355
9
votes
Should the scope be expanded to Fitness & Sports?
Most of those topics are already on topic for a physical fitness site (general exercising advice, injury prevention, rest & muscle recovery, nutritional advice).
As for the specific sports, in as muc …
- 355
5
votes
Subjectivity & Scope: Where is the line on this site?
Your concern seems to be more a matter of the thoroughness and specificity of questions, rather than "subjectivity & scope." … The FAQ outlines the scope of topics discussed (updated as needed), while the Good Subjective guidelines deals with issue of qualia ("what sort" or "what kind"). …
- 355